photogs

Narcissists can feel empathy, research finds

243.jpg

Those parents at the park taking all those photos are actually paying less attention to the moment, she says, because they’re focused on the act of taking the photo.

“Then they’ve got a thousand photos, and then they just dump the photos somewhere and don’t really look at them very much, ’cause it’s too difficult to tag them and organize them,” says Maryanne Garry, a psychology professor at the Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand. […]

Henkel, who researches human memory at Fairfield University in Connecticut, found what she called a “photo-taking impairment effect.”

“The objects that they had taken photos of — they actually remembered fewer of them, and remembered fewer details about those objects. Like, how was this statue’s hands positioned, or what was this statue wearing on its head. They remembered fewer of the details if they took photos of them, rather than if they had just looked at them,” she says.

Henkel says her students’ memories were impaired because relying on an external memory aid means you subconsciously count on the camera to remember the details for you.

{ NPR | Continue reading }

photo { Florian Maier-Aichen, Untitled (Cloud), 2001 }

People perceive religious and moral iconography in ambiguous objects, ranging from grilled cheese to bird feces

28.jpg

While both tourism research and photography research have grown into substantial academic disciplines, little has been written about their point of intersection: tourist photography. In this paper, I argue that a number of philosophically oriented theories of photography may offer useful perspectives on tourist photography. […]

When I was observing photographing tourists on the Pont Neuf and in the Jardin des Tuileries in Paris, one of the things that struck me was the fact that some tourists, when they came across a sculpture, first took a picture of it, and only started looking after the picture had been taken. Perhaps Sontag is right to argue that the production of pictures serves to appease the tourist’s anxiety about not working; in any case, this type of predatory photographic behavior promotes the accumulation of images to a goal in itself rather than a means to produce meaning or memories.

{ Dennis Schep/Depth of Field | Continue reading }

When I wake up in the afternoon, which it pleases me to do

2341.jpg

What do you want to hear first: Good news or bad news?

Our answer to this question is different depending on whether we’re the one delivering the news or we’re the one receiving the news.

{ Jeremiah Stanghini | Continue reading }

photo { Anna Grzelewska }

Ask Lictor Hackett or Lector Reade of Garda Growley

h1.jpg

h2.jpg

h3.jpg

The exhibition that stands out for me is Horst Ademeit at the Hamburger Bahnhof – Museum für Gegenwart in Berlin, 2011. In a small, often overlooked area of the museum was an overwhelming amount of meticulously ordered material by an artist I’d never heard of before. After being rejected by his parents, his wife, his school, and even his teacher – Joseph Beuys – Ademeit abandoned drawing and painting for photography and writing. He shot more than 6,000 Polaroids in isolation over a 14-year period, which engulfed the room.

In the margins of the Polaroids, and in seemingly endless calendars and booklets, he handwrote notations at a scale that borders on indecipherable. He was studying the impact of cold rays, earth rays, electromagnetic waves and other forms of radiation on his health and safety. He protected himself with magnets and herbs from what he perceived to be dangerous invisible forces, while obsessively creating this trove of records and evidence.

{ Taryn Simon/Guardian | Galerie SuSanne Zander }

‘Why, every year about spring time, I feel such a violent impulse to go ever further south.’ –Nietzsche

235.jpg

Keepin it real since 94 ☞ *Amaze*

251.jpg

“Would you please take a selfie of my friend and I in front of this window?”

She was not aware that she had approached a linguist. […]

It would not be like him to snarl that of my friend and I should be of my friend and me (or perhaps better, of me and my friend). Nor did he remonstrate with the woman over her rather extraordinary misuse of the noun selfie.

{ Language Log | Continue reading }

unrelated { Photographer countersues Empire State Building for $5M over topless photos }

‘Nothing in the universe is contingent.’ –Spinoza

22.jpg

{ Robert Heinecken, Lessons in Posing Subjects/Matching Facial Expressions, 1981 }

451.jpg

{ Robert Heinecken, Kodak Safety Film/Figure Horizon, 1971 }

4231.jpg

{ Robert Heinecken, Cybill Shepherd/Phone Sex, 1992 | Robert Heinecken retrospective at MoMA, through September 7, 2014 }

‘Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn’t go away.’ —Phillip K. Dick

e2.jpg

e11.jpg

{ Arvida Byström }

Do I believe in me? Controversy, controversy.

321.jpg

You prefer apples to oranges, but cherries to apples. Yet if I offer you just cherries and oranges, you take the oranges. […] New research shows that sometimes a decision like this, which sounds irrational, can actually be the best one.

{ Nature | Continue reading }

photo { James Tolich }

‘a book that is just every time pinochio is eaten by the whale in every iteration of the story, printed on sheets of lead’ —@BAKKOOONN

49.jpg

jennyapples
Looks like they did a pretty simple edit job. I’ve done more retouching on basic portrait work.

ToHelenBackAgain
Then you’re a crap photographer.

jennyapples
lololol colour balance, brightness, levels, these are all totally normal things to alter.

ToHelenBackAgain
You can’t get a good shot in the first place, you’re the problem. Photographers did not always have retouching to fall back on, and they got some pretty damned good shots without it. You are advertising that you are unable to do that.

jennyapples
After spending 15 years as a photographer and countless hours in the darkroom, I am authorized to say you don’t have a fucking clue what you’re talking about. Dodge and burn, fool. Dodge and burn.

ToHelenBackAgain
Argument from authority, which tends to be problematic in the first place (look it up, fool), and also pre-invalidated by the very subject.
Dude, this is Annie Freakin’ Leibovitz. You’re not a better authority than she is, and she screwed up massively here.

jennyapples
Have I personally offended you? I’ve seen you on here before and know you’re not a troll. Are you just a massive fucking asshole, or what is your deal? My point was that these aren’t particularly edited shots and that they were fairly true to the original photos, so the bounty on the pictures did not serve any purpose because there was almost nothing to reveal. And when I said I’ve done more editing on basic portrait work, I clearly, to anyone who isn’t you, was saying that these were edited with such a light touch that even regular old portrait work requires more editing (i.e. not much).

ToHelenBackAgain
You’re just wrong, that’s all.

{ Jezebel | Continue reading }

Everything is real

316.jpg

{ Chino Otsuka superimposes her adult self into childhood photos }

Alice had a thing for Bob, or Animal as his friends called him

312.jpg

{ How To Make Your Face (Digitally) Unforgettable | NPR | MIT | PDF }